Comorbidity among axis II diagnoses was common. Subjects met the criteria for an average of 2.4 personality disorder diagnoses (SD=1.6). The subjects with borderline personality disorder were more likely than those without borderline personality disorder to meet the criteria for histrionic (29.2% versus 5.6%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (30.6% versus 15.7%; ? 2 =5.59, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.5% versus 3.7%; ? 2 =4.98, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with paranoid personality disorder were more likely than those without paranoid personality disorder to meet the criteria for schizotypal (49.2% versus 20.5%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (33.3% versus 15.4%; ? 2 =7.77, df=1, p=0.005), histrionic (23.5% versus 10.3%; ? 2 =5.90, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.7% versus 4.3%; ? 2 =4.34, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with borderline personality disorder had a higher number of personality disorder diagnoses (other than borderline personality disorder) than subjects without borderline personality disorder (mean=2.3 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–2.35, df=178, p=0.02). Subjects with paranoid personality disorder also had a higher number of personality disorders (other than paranoid personality disorder) than subjects without paranoid personality disorder (mean=2.5 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–3.44, df=178, p=0.001).

Shock in Youth or Puberty

Table dos reveals the frequency out-of exposure to trauma through the youth/puberty into the victims that have and instead borderline personality infection. Victims which have borderline personality disorder had rather higher cost from actual discipline for the youngsters/puberty than simply sufferers without borderline identity ailment, which have gender regulated (52.8% versus 34.3%; ? 2 =5.43, df=step one, p=0.02), but the teams failed to disagree in their pricing away from intimate abuse (30.2% versus 19.4%; ? 2 =step one.46, df=step one, p=0.23) or off other sorts of upheaval inside the youthfulness/puberty.

Subjects that have paranoid identification ailment in addition to got a somewhat high rate regarding physical discipline in the teens/adolescence than sufferers instead of paranoid character problems, with gender regulated (54.0% as opposed to thirty-five.0%; ? 2 =5.70, df=step 1, p=0.02). 4% in place of twenty two.2%; ? 2 =0.23, df=step one, p=0.63) or of other kinds of upheaval inside childhood/adolescence. New relationships out of youngsters/teenage actual punishment that have borderline character ailment with paranoid identification problems was in fact and additionally examined by using each of the almost every other personality disorder diagnoses as the more covariates, and also the abilities was statistically equivalent.

Victims with antisocial identity illness were apt to be compared to those instead of antisocial character disease getting already been bereaved during the young people (53.8% in place of 21.0%; ? 2 =seven.67, df=1, p=0.006). Not one of other kinds of identity disorder are notably and you can absolutely https://datingranking.net/cs/planetromeo-recenze/ on the intimate discipline, actual punishment, otherwise the other sorts of injury inside youthfulness/adolescence.

Upheaval during the Adulthood

This new cost of contact with stress within the adulthood when you look at the sufferers which have and without borderline personality infection also are shown when you look at the Desk dos. Borderline identity ailment was not rather with the actual assault, intimate violence, and other variety of stress within the adulthood, as we grow old and you can gender managed. Sufferers which have paranoid identification infection was indeed a whole lot more likely compared to those instead of paranoid character disorder for knowledgeable real violence into the adulthood, as we age and sex managed (33.0% rather than 17.9%; ? 2 =4.84, df=step one, p=0.03). People with paranoid identity disease also got large prices of injuries/injury (63.5% as opposed to 47.0%; ? 2 =cuatro.86, df=step 1, p=0.03) and you will combat (9.5% rather than step one.7%; ? 2 =6.forty-eight, df=step 1, p=0.01) than those without any disorder, but these distinctions weren’t mathematically tall adopting the outcomes of numerous reviews was in fact controlled. Nothing of one’s other kinds of personality disease try notably associated with almost any shock in adulthood.

Prevalence off PTSD

Brand new life prevalence of PTSD contained in this selection of victims was 17.8% (N=32). The newest cost away from PTSD in women (19.0%, N=12) and you can boys (17.1%, N=20) were not rather additional (? dos =0.eleven, df=step one, p=0.74). PTSD are most commonly known inside the victims having paranoid (29%) and you can borderline (25%) personality ailment, and you will least preferred within the subjects having narcissistic (10%) and you may passive-aggressive (12%) identity sickness. Toward kept variety of personality illness, the new prevalence regarding PTSD ranged off 14% to 18%. Victims that have and you can versus PTSD didn’t disagree within total number of character sickness diagnoses (mean=2.5, SD=step 1.dos, versus suggest=2.cuatro, SD=step 1.6; t=–0.thirty-six, df=178, p=0.72).